I'm still writing reports
long after the job on site
is finished.
Tell me the task that eats your week. I'll build an AI tool that takes it off your plate.
I'm still writing reports
long after the job on site
is finished.
We answer the same
handful of questions
every single day.
Important follow-ups
only happen if
someone remembers.
I know it could
run better.
I just don't know where to start.
The site work is finished. The paperwork is not.
A routine external condition assessment and cathodic protection survey was undertaken on tank T-12. The floor CP system is performing acceptably at two of three permanent reference cells; PR-2 and coupon C-1 recorded instant-off potentials less negative than the −850 mV (CSE) criterion, indicating localised under-protection of the tank floor.
External inspection identified active rust staining and coating breakdown on the east shell adjacent to the access stair, where dry film thickness was measured well below specification. No leaks were identified.
| Location | On (mV) | Instant-off | Meets −850 |
|---|---|---|---|
| PR-1 | −1040 | −890 | Yes |
| PR-2 | −970 | −812 | No |
| PR-3 | −1105 | −915 | Yes |
| Coupon C-1 | — | −805 | No |
East shell (near access stair): active rust staining running approximately 1.5 m from a lap weld. DFT of 150 µm measured — 50% below the 300 µm specification.
North shell: coating in good condition, minor chalking only. Nozzle N4: light surface rust on bolts, no leak observed. Roof edge: bird-proofing missing, water pooling at two locations.
1. Investigate and restore CP levels at PR-2 and coupon C-1 (check rectifier output), then re-survey to confirm the −850 mV criterion. Priority: high
2. Abrasive preparation and re-coat of the east shell to the 300 µm specification over the rust-affected area. Priority: high
3. Reinstate roof-edge bird-proofing and correct drainage to eliminate pooling. Priority: medium
The same questions all day — then the important enquiry arrives after hours.
The same information, hand-carried between the same apps — every day.
Your team knows AI could help, but nobody has time to separate the useful tools from the noise.
What a site crew needs from AI isn't what your engineers or your office team need, so each session is shaped around the roles, the technical level and the work that group actually does. Mixed teams are the norm, not a problem.
Estimate how much time repetitive work may be taking from your team — and what that capacity could be worth each month.
I don't arrive with a product to sell you — I start by understanding how your work actually flows, find where time and attention are leaking, and build the fix around that.
I learn how the work runs today, from the people actually doing it.
We find where time, accuracy or attention is being lost.
We agree the one change that's worth making first.
I build it and test it with the people who'll use it.
You're supported after it's live, so it keeps working.
Their inspectors were losing whole afternoons turning field notes into formal reports. This tool drafts the report from the notes, keeps their template and style, and flags the gaps an engineer still needs to confirm — so nothing gets signed off half-done.
It can become your next best mAIte.
Not a faceless agency. I'm a Perth-based practical-AI builder with a background in WHS and ISO. I've written the reports. I've retyped the same details into three different systems, answered the same handful of questions every day, and chased the follow-ups nobody had time to chase. So I know exactly which admin is worth handing to a tool — and which isn't. Warm to work with, sharp on the delivery.
Tell me the task that eats your week. I'll take it off your plate.
Thanks — that's with me.
I read every enquiry myself and I'll come back to you shortly. If it's urgent, call 0406 183 251.